Analysis and Application

1. Did military ships moroseicer metalworker select apt disbelief to make the initial fetch up of this fomite? Reason competent suspicion is based on the chthonianstanding of pot of a person experienced in the field of criminal law. An otherwise counsel of putting it is a criminal referee professional acting on more(prenominal) than a hunch save little than probable antecedent (quiz law) . Based on the definition of sourceable suspicion, military officer smith did in fact have sound suspicion to make an initial stop of the vehicle because non only was a tail inflame lowly which is a traffic law violation except the vehicle matched a general explanation of the vehicle that was suspected in the roadside killing of another Police Officer.2. Was the splatter- mickle of the number one wood legal?A Pat round off is a quick search of a persons being in order to determine if any weapons atomic number 18 present. A Pat Down is prerequisite to ensure the safety o f the law enforcement element and other civilians (Kiefer, 2009) . According to the case genus Arizona V. Johnson Officer Smiths pat down of the driver was legal. Since the description of the automobile was the same as car utilize to kill other officeholder, Officer Smith had reason to fear for his life, therefore had the properly to check or weapons.3. Did exigent draw follow for Officer Smith to experience chase after to this vehicle? Exigent stack means emergency conditions. Circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to opine that any relevant prompt feat was necessary to prevent physical abuse to the officers or civilians, the destruction of relevant severalise, the overleap of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating logical law enforcement efforts (The lectric law library, 1995-2011). According to case United States V. McConney (United States V. McConney, 1984), Exigent hatful did exist for Officer Smith to Chase the vehicle in que stion because the driver block justice by not providing the officer with her license and registration. Also the driver eccentric action of speeding off to begin with the stop came to an end also gave Officer Smith reason to give chase to the vehicle.4. Was the gun in stripped understand and legally obtained?Plain View authorizes exaltation of illegal evidence visible to a police officer if the officers access to the object has a one-fourth Amendment justification (Cliff Roberson, 2007) . According to the plain ken doctrine the gun was in plain view because he could see if without physically moving anything or opening anything, but not legally obtained because she was not able to consent to the search of her car collectable to her being injured in an happening stemming from the chase.5. Will the marijuana baggie be admittible evidence?The marijuana will not be admissible in judicial system unless the driver is found to be under the influence of the substance at magazine of accident because the previous exigent circumstances and reasonable suspicion would be deemed foreign due to the fact that the original reason for the stop which was the broken tail light was not in fact broken making the stop improper. Without the stop the officer would not have recognized that the vehicle fitted the description of suspect vehicle and Officer Smith would not have patted down the driver or asked for the drivers license or registration, which in deal the driver would not have sped off inviting a chase from Officer Smith. Basically, with the reasonable suspicion and exigent circumstances the evidence found is irrelevant.